When does a book's author help or hurt the screenwriter's vision?

When does a book's author help or hurt the screenwriter's vision?


When does a book's author help or hurt the screenwriter's vision?

Roth reportedly eventually approved of the movie. But Romano’s experience echoes the kind of relationship most screenwriters seem to want to have with source-material originators. And when those pesky authors are not around (because of being dead) or simply absent (because of disinterest or privacy issues), screenwriters tend to feel far freer with adaptations.

Once loosed from the specter of a looming author opinion (or worse, an author commenting negatively on the adaptation once it’s been filmed), screenwriters find a certain elasticity in the material. Tom Ford has directed only two movies, but he’s adapted books each time: “A Single Man” was based on the late Christopher Isherwood’s book of the same name, and his new “Nocturnal Animals” is based on the late Austin Wright’s “Tony and Susan.”"

“ had to learn that the book is the book, you read the book and find out what speaks to you and put it aside and write the movie with the same core message,” says Ford, who admits it is easier as a director not to have the author in the equation.

Had Isherwood or Wright been around, though, he says he’d still have kept them at a distance. “You give an author meaningful consultation rights,” he says. “Had either of them been alive I would have talked with them. But you want your movie to be a singular expression of what you’re trying to say, and the ultimate singular expression is one where no one else has any control over what you want to say.”

For many filmmakers, finding a way to dovetail that singular expression with the book’s intent can be a challenge. Whit Stillman took an early epistolary novella by Jane Austen, “Lady Susan,” and turned it into “Love & Friendship” — but while he did expand at least one character's role (that of Sir James Martin), he also wanted to make sure the dialogue rang true for the period and for Austen.

When does a book's author help or hurt the screenwriter's vision?

“We focused on the language,” he says. “I obsessively read her work, and I found experts and all sorts of tools to get the words and phrases right. But sometimes they would say, ‘This phrase is impossible in the 18th century, and I’d find it in Jane Austen’s text.”

That’s apparently less true with films based on real events; “Sully” screenwriter Todd Komarnicki was unable to speak with the late Jeffrey Zaslow, who co-wrote “Highest Duty” with Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger, but he did seek out the man himself.

“He was a great partner, because he understood there was a great difference between a book and a movie, and he trusted us to surrender that,” says Komarnicki. “He was great with the aviation elements, and he might say, ‘I would never say that particular word.’ It was a beautiful thing.”

And then there are folks like screenwriter Patrick Ness, who — all due respect to Romano — may actually have had the dream setup for adapting “A Monster Calls.” For one thing, it’s his book — he wrote it based on notes and a partial chapter after original author Siobhan Dowd died. But then he got to do something almost unheard of.

“I decided to write the script first to say, ‘This is what I value in the material and what can be changed and I need to find a filmmaker who wants to make that,’” he says.

Yet even Ness had to come to terms with shutting up his internal author so that the screenplay could have its own voice. “I genuinely believe that the book remains, and the book is mine,” he says. “You can cherish the book and the film for different reasons. If you force things, it will make a bad movie.”

The fact is, in the war between author and screenwriter, the screenwriter virtually always wins. As Stillman notes, “Living authors are a problem. It’s much better to have an author safely departed because they do cause trouble. What you have to remember is that you owe everything to the movie, and nothing to the original.”



Add Comment

all comments

  Other news

more
‘Not racist’: Landlord who banned ‘colored’ tenants says he won’t apologize

‘Not racist’: Landlord who banned ‘colored’ tenants says he won’t apologize..

30-Mar, 11:33

Buy-to-let tycoon Fergus Wilson, who was last week exposed for banning...

Pirate patrols

Pirate patrols..

29-Mar, 19:28

Across the world there has been a decline in piracy and sea robbery, but...

Money borrowed to buy stocks hits record

Money borrowed to buy stocks hits record..

30-Mar, 06:39

Borrowing money to buy stocks is a sign that investors remain optimistic...

Matt Damon gives his verdict on what kind of dad George Clooney will be

Matt Damon gives his verdict on what kind of dad George Clooney will be..

30-Mar, 06:07

George Clooney and wife Amal are expecting twins later this year Matt...

DuPont, Impax Labs gain, G-III Apparel slides

DuPont, Impax Labs gain, G-III Apparel slides..

27-Mar, 21:50

Stocks that moved substantially or traded heavily on Monday: DuPont...

Accused Flight Attendant Negotiating Plea Agreement

Accused Flight Attendant Negotiating Plea Agreement..

31-Jan, 15:30

A flight attendant accused of making fake bomb threats on two Skywest...

Democrats to highlight a red state's success with Obamacare in response to Trump speech

Democrats to highlight a red state's success with Obamacare in response to Trump speech..

27-Feb, 13:56

President Trump's first major congressional address this week will be met...

iZon Camera Keeps Eye on Your Home

iZon Camera Keeps Eye on Your Home..

05-Mar, 11:14

When I'm home my dog stays off the couch and is pretty obedient. When I...