Strong Words, Little Action: ICOs Draw Fire at US Congress Hearing

Strong Words, Little Action: ICOs Draw Fire at US Congress Hearing

"Congress has a responsibility to ensure that investors are protected without unduly preventing growth."

So said U.S. Rep. Randy Hultgren of Illinois during a Wednesday hearing of the House Capital Markets, Securities and Investment Subcommittee, which metin the morning in Washington, D.C. Drawing a mix of academic and industry witnesses, the hearing highlighted the divergent viewpoints on the technology held by some of the members of Congress.

As is perhaps unsurprising, the hearing saw U.S. lawmakers strike both supportive and critical tones on cryptocurrency - one member called cryptocurrencies a "crock" in an opening statement while Rep. Tom Emmer, who appeared at a blockchain industry event last week, remarked that they constitute "a huge topic that cannot possibly be scratched even in five minutes."

Yet ultimately, many subcommittee members expressed a commitment to strike a balance between oversight and the accommodation of technological innovation.

Many of the questions focused on the regulatory parameters in place in the U.S. today, with some of those queries aimed at Mike Lempres, chief legal and risk officer for Coinbase and the sole representative from a startup working in the exchange space. Lempres, who joined the company in early 2017, advocated for a balanced approach to regulating the space.

Indeed, some of the members voiced a strong appetite for tackling regulation through legislative acts.

Rep. Maloney, who is the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee, explained that she is working on a cryptocurrency oversight bill that would cover exchanges that offer tradingservices for digital assets. And Rep. Bill Huizenga of Michigan, who is the chairman of the Capital Markets, Securities and Investment subcommittee, all but declared his intention to pursue some kind of legislative action.

"This panel, this Congress is not going to sit by idly with a lack of protection for investors."

Constituent interest

Notably, one of the panel members highlighted the interest apparently being expressed back home in his Congressional district.

Speaking during the hearing, Rep. Keith Ellison said that the topic had come up during recent weeks.

"In my meetings with constituents over the last several months, I've had many of them say 'Hey, what's going on with this cryptocurrency, should I get into it?'" he remarked, going on to ask:

"If somebody wants to invest in this area what should they know as an unsophisticated investor?"

That question was fielded by Dr. Chris Brummer, a professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center, who expressed a degree of caution in that context.

"I would certainly say that given the complexity of many of these instruments that it's very dangerous," he said.

Less, not more

By contrast, it was Rep. Tom Emmer - who spoke with CoinDesk on the sidelines of last week's DC Blockchain Summit - who took what was perhaps the most contrarian view compared to the remarks from Maloney and Huizenga.

"I find myself maybe not with my colleagues on some of this," he said during the hearing, going on to say: "Yet I hear elected officials who don't have any concept of what we're doing here ... talking about 'we have to go in and regulate.'"

Emmer remarked that that blockchain's potential in opening up capital access is "something Democrats and Republicans should celebrate." He also struck a favorable tone to some of the panelists - who argued that more clarity is needed around the regulations in place today versus the imposition of new rules on the industry.

"I realize there has to be some regulation, but it's the balance," Emmer remarked. "And I've heard from the panel we have regulation in place but we just need clarity."

Even still, there was a palpable sense of wanting to strike the right balance among the committee members. This sentiment was perhaps expressed best by Rep. Ted Budd, who argued that oversight in this area is something that the U.S. "has to get right."

He remarked:

"Regulation in this space is something that the U.S. has to get right. Because poor or rushed policy in cryptocurrencies really threatens our reputation in finance and technology."

Image via Financial Services Committee/YouTube

14.03.2018 / 10:25 38
ICOs Go to Washington: What to Expect When Congress Talks Crypto ICOs Go to Washington: What to Expect
Cryptocurrencies are heading back to Capitol Hill on Wednesday. On March 14, a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services
Running Up That Hill: Here Are All Members of Congress Involved in Crypto Running Up That Hill: Here Are All
As federal regulation appears imminent, the crypto community is hanging on every word legislators say on the topic. Here is a roundup of some public
Congress Must 'Push Back' Against Overregulation of Blockchain, Says US Rep Congress Must 'Push Back' Against
Blockchain technology could drive the most significant change in society since the American Revolution, U.S. Rep. Tom Emmer says. But only if
ICOs Brush Off Regulatory Concerns, Raising $1 Billion for the Third Month in a Row ICOs Brush Off Regulatory Concerns,
Despite all the talk of increased regulation and looming lawsuits, ICOs seem immune. Many new tokens are struggling to trade above their ICO price on
CFTC's Giancarlo: US and Foreign Regulators Teaming Up on Crypto CFTC's Giancarlo: US and Foreign
U.S. regulators are working with their counterparts overseas to combat cryptocurrency fraud, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) chairman J.
Mexico?s Congress Approves Cryptocurrency, Crowdfunding Regulations Mexico?s Congress Approves
Mexicos lower house of Congress recently approved a bill thats set to regulate the financial technology (fintech) sector in the country. The bill
Comments (0)
Add a comment
Comment on