Anonymous user sends 0.0002 BTC and pays 1.99 BTC in Fees!

Some days ago, Ethereum World News reported that an anonymous user made several transactions from their personal wallet, with enormous fees. What at one point seemed to be a mistake soon gave rise to a strong debate after this practice was repeated several times throughout the day. On March 11, this unusual incident happened again, but this time with a Bitcoin (BTC) wallet, which sent less than a dollar in BTC, paying fees of near $7769.


The information, available for verification in the block explorer of the Bitcoin (BTC) blockchain shows that the transaction comes from a wallet address with two movements: A deposit for that amount of money and a spend 10 minutes later with the extraordinary fee.

Considering that there have been no further operations from this address, it is difficult to determine whether it was a mistake or if there is any motive behind these types of transactions. Precisely what raised suspicions in the series of identical activities carried out on the Ethereum network is that they came from the same wallet address.


Doing a little more detailed monitoring, it is possible to detect that the address received the funds from the wallet 1G47mSr3oANXMafVr8UC4pzV7FEAzo3r9. This wallet is quite active (more than 367,000 transactions) with a current balance of 2.7 million dollars and near 400 million dollars of total funds moved, so it could be concluded that it was either funds withdrawn from some Exchange, or it was an error done by the staff of an Exchange in an internal movement.

Fat-Fingers? Money Laundering?

The community has, of course, discussed the causes of this disaster however, apart from the possibility of an error, the two strongest explanations seem to be

The improper coding of a trading bot
Some complex scheme of money laundering through the secret mining of a block containing the transaction with the exorbitant fees (not uploading it to the blockchain until its mined).

In the case of the present transaction, and until there is evidence of more similar situations, it is very possible that it is a human error trying to pump up the fees without verifying the amounts. Please, if you are a user of cryptocurrencies, it is always worth the effort to spend a few seconds to check all the data of a transaction. Remember that in the world of cryptocurrencies, you are your own bank.

The post Anonymous user sends 0.0002 BTC and pays 1.99 BTC in Fees! appeared first on Ethereum World News.

14.03.2019 / 08:00 101
Insanity: Ethereum Wallet Pays Nearly $575,000 in Fees to Transfer $25 in ETH Insanity: Ethereum Wallet Pays Nearly
Strange things occur in the cryptocurrency market. Prices spike following negative news, and positive news is met with a strong sell-off.
Cheap Fees Are Sooo 2018! Somebody Paid Over Half a Million USD in Fees To Send 25 Bucks Worth of ETH Cheap Fees Are Sooo 2018! Somebody Paid
The world of cryptocurrencies never ceases to surprise us and every now, and then a bizarre -or suspicious- news ignites the communitys flame again.
Bitcoin Reliability to Improve through Child Pays for Parent, Says Coinbase Bitcoin Reliability to Improve through
Sending and receiving cryptos such as Bitcoin today is increasingly becoming difficult. As transaction fees remain unstable and volatile, it does
New Samourai Wallet Feature Makes Bitcoin Transactions Private New Samourai Wallet Feature Makes
A 2-wallet Samourai Stowaway offers to make transactions private by masking user identity while keeping funds safe. Bitcoin Transactions Are
Someone Sent 300 Million USD in Bitcoin (BTC) Paying a Fee of 0.004 USD Someone Sent 300 Million USD in Bitcoin
Reddit forums got heated a few hours ago when a multimillion-dollar transaction was reported on Bitcoins Blockchain at almost minimal cost. A wallet
$500 Million Has Been Mistakenly Sent to Ethereums Genesis Address $500 Million Has Been Mistakenly Sent
Genesis blocks hold a symbolism thats almost spiritual. They represent the birth of a new cryptocurrency, and when that currency flourishes, its
Comments (0)
Add a comment
Comment on