íàçâàíèå

If You’re a Wikipedia Contributor, Owning Cryptocurrency May Be a Conflict of Interest


The web’s favorite crowdsourced encyclopedia has just edited its own behavioral guidelines. Wikipedia’s “Conflict of interest” (COI) page outlining etiquette for its 140,000 active editors now includes a reference to cryptocurrency. If you’re editing pages about crypto, the mere act of owning cryptocurrency may preclude you from doing so.


Wikipedia Is Conflicted on Cryptocurrency

According to Wikipedia, any external relationship its contributors hold – including a relationship with cryptocurrency – could present a conflict of interest. Its COI page states:

Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic, legal, or financial (including holding a cryptocurrency)—can trigger a COI. How close the relationship needs to be before it becomes a concern on Wikipedia is governed by common sense. For example, an article about a band should not be written by the band’s manager, and a biography should not be an autobiography or written by the subject’s spouse.

On the one hand, these guidelines make a lot of sense, but on the other, they create a paradox as the people most knowledgeable about a particular Wikipedia page are those with a strong personal interest in its subject matter. It’s hard to see how owning bitcoin, for example, should bar an editor from being able to update the Bitcoin page. With smaller, more controversial cryptos however (think IOTA or Verge), there’s greater potential for a COI to emerge. It’s easy to envisage a scenario, for instance, in which a passionate editor may decide to censor or exclude negative news about their favorite cryptocurrency.


Partisanship Is a Persistent Threat on Wikipedia

If You’re a Wikipedia Contributor, Owning Cryptocurrency May Be a Conflict of InterestCertain Wikipedia pages attract an abnormally high number of edits, often because the subject is controversial or prone to attracting mischief-makers. In extreme cases, this can lead to a page becoming fully or partially locked to prevent anonymous editors from distorting the truth or inserting their own agenda. Wikipedia is notorious for its edit wars in which opposing camps attempt to control the narrative. One such page to have fallen prey to this is Bitcoin Cash. Its talk page notes that “There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article” to address this.

Anyone can create a Wikipedia account and become an editor. To date over 33 million ‘Wikipedians’ have done so, of whom almost 140,000 are active. This army of volunteers performs an essential job, updating, proofing, and fact-checking millions of entries. Given the complexity of verifying the legitimacy of Wikipedia’s 5.6 million English articles, verifying that all its editors don’t have a conflict of interest is impractical. As the Bitcoin Cash page demonstrates, even when an editor doesn’t own a particular cryptocurrency, it doesn’t always prevent them from being tempted to tamper.

23.04.2018 / 15:05 32
Bank of Japan’s Warning Has Little Affect Bitcoin Bounceback Bank of Japan’s Warning Has Little
Japan takes another side step with its relationship to cryptocurrency trading as the Central Bank releases a negative Q&A guide for those seeking
Binance CEO Reassures Crypto Traders, No Conflict With Japanese Regulators Binance CEO Reassures Crypto Traders,
Binance founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao has taken to Twitter to express his disappointment to what he called “irresponsible journalism” and to
Research Suggests Tether Has Banking Relationship with Puerto Rico-based Noble Bank Research Suggests Tether Has Banking
New research suggests that cryptocurrency startup Tether — creator of dollar-pegged stablecoin USDT — has a banking relationship with Puerto Rican
Bitcoin Popularity Surges in South Africa Amid Political, Economic Turmoil  Bitcoin Popularity Surges in South
Bitcoin’s popularity is soaring in South Africa where it is being viewed as a safe-haven from increasing political and economic uncertainty. South
Patent Data Reveals the Banking Sector’s Strange Relationship with Bitcoin Patent Data Reveals the Banking
Banks and bitcoin are odd bedfellows, but they do share some things in common. To its proponents, bitcoin is the future of money, but it still takes
‘Conflict of Interest’: Litecoin Creator Charlie Lee Sells His Entire LTC Balance ‘Conflict of Interest’: Litecoin
Litecoin creator Charlie Lee revealed on Wednesday that he had liquidated his entire LTC balance and donated it to the Litecoin Foundation, although
Comments (0)
Add a comment
Comment on